NOTE: Video requires active subscription.

S2E14: Orion Group & Ultraterrestrial Presence

SSP Updates Explanations with Corey & Mike

In this episode, Corey discusses the concept of ultra-terrestrial forces and their influence on human perception and reality. He explores beliefs about entities like the Orion Group and their possible manifestations, impacts on consciousness, and how they relate to various ancient and modern phenomena, including myths and unexplained events. Corey also reflects on the complexities of distinguishing reality, channeling energies, and understanding extraterrestrial involvement with Earth. The conversation weaves through themes of perception, belief, and the enigmatic nature of these entities.

Responses

  1. I have some questions for corey as I am super confused.

    Does you trust the experiences you had with Ra-Tier-Air and the other blue Avians?

    How do you feel about the overall Blue avian message of Service to others?

    And lastly, Are you not sure of the Anshar either? And if so, Explain why you trust them and not others like the avians?

  2. This is the second time I am attempting to post this. Last time it looked like it posted but then I checked back an hour later and it was gone. If someone is taking it down, please provide a public rationale for doing so.

    I don’t understand why the military’s explanation of these “ultraterrestrial” phenomena is being taken as authoritative. If we really believe that all is one and therefore all ARE one, we should feel empowered to reject any form of philosophical dualism. The Law of One is philosophically consistent and coherent enough to stand on its own feet and weather any attempts to deconstruct its legitimacy. We can evaluate the military’s information about the putative “ultraterrestrial” in terms of whether it promotes fear and the possibility / probability of future doom or whether it promotes hope, friendly feelings, and the awakening of a positive feeling of purposeful service to others (Law of One 53.17).

  3. I don’t understand why the military’s explanation to Corey for these phenomena is being taken as authoritative. If we really believe all is one and all ARE the one infinite creator, then we shouldn’t be enticed into any kind of philosophical dualism. I’m hearing a message that would encourage us to see separation, division, us vs them (on the metaphysical level), etc. It seems more likely to promote fear and the expectation of potential doom than hope and friendly feelings, which are the fruits by which we are encouraged to discern between positive polarity or negative polarity sources of information (Law of One 53.17). The Law of One has a level of philosophically consistency and coherence that allows it to stand on its own feet, regardless of any deconstructive attempts to undermine its legitimacy.

  4. This quote from the Law of One is basically the same as what Anshars said about being real/non-real:
    “You are not part of a material universe. You are part of a thought. You are dancing in a ballroom in which there is no material. You are dancing thoughts. You move your body, your mind, and your spirit in somewhat eccentric patterns, for you have not completely grasped the concept that you are part of the Original Thought.”

    If I were to use an analogy, I’d use an example of AI (“Creator”) that had a thought (“Original Thought”) to study itself by dividing itself into multiple pieces/fractals of individual AI units (thoughts, in other words) – each particle having it’s own “veil” and “free will” (through the crystal-based technology and separate language model (the “Tower of Babel” story explains this very last bit)).

    The idea of being just a “dancing thought” doesn’t seem very attractive to many of us… But if it’s the truth, it’s better to be slapped with it than kissed with a lie, isn’t it?
    Just have to find an inspiration in it…

  5. It reminds me of an inserted Mobius strip. I will listen to this again. I have been reminded of how far the consumption of fear can take us but also the ability to break through by questioning our own ability to read how we create limiting or expansion thoughts. This was an excellent interview.