Corbell/Knapp/Colthart/Zabel - The UFO Hearing - What Happened? What’s Next?
Next Episode: Rep. Eric Burlison Amendment for David Grusch Security Clearance
Responses
You must be logged in to post a comment.
FREE & UNCENSORED SOCIAL/VIDEO NETWORK
For Students of the Deepest Truths of Our Reality
Merci !En tant que chercheur de vérités comme tout le monde, je ne suis ni journaliste, militaire ou alerteur ! Une question se pose ? Pour ne pas divulguer les PANs et autres plans d’ingénierie ! Réflexion de celle-ci ! Lorsqu’un pays est infiltré par un ennemi et occupe des postes très haut placés, quel intérêt aurait-il de dire la vérité, ils se cacheront derrière le secret défense avec des lois de sécurité nationale ?
Translation: Thank you! As a truth-seeker—much like everyone else—I am neither a journalist, nor a military officer, nor a whistleblower. A question arises: Why is information regarding PANs (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) and other engineering projects being withheld? Here is a thought on the matter: When a country has been infiltrated by an adversary—one that occupies high-ranking positions—what incentive would they have to tell the truth? Wouldn’t they simply hide behind the veil of national defense secrecy and national security laws?