I am putting this statement together so people can read my story in one place: what I experienced, how I became part of the disclosure movement, what changed my understanding, and why I returned to Jesus. I also want to explain the religious influences that troubled me behind the scenes and the dangers I now see in teachings I once helped promote.

I reported my experiences honestly as I perceived them. I also created science-fiction stories based on those experiences for my IP and franchise. My testimony and my fictional adaptations need to be understood separately. This is my account of the encounters, conversations, and changes in belief that brought me to where I am today.

BEFORE I HAD A PUBLIC ROLE

I grew up in a deeply religious family. My mother has told me that even as a toddler, I described things other people didn’t seem to see. As a child, I experienced what I understood as shadow beings, deceased people, and unexplained presences. My family used Christianity as the framework to make sense of it. Some of the experiences frightened the adults around me as much as they frightened me.

My maternal grandfather was a retired Nazarene minister and a World War II Navy veteran. He listened to me and was deeply interested in Daniel, Revelation, and the Second Coming. His willingness to listen meant a lot to me. Years later, his warnings about false prophets would take on a much more personal meaning.

Around age eleven, I recall lying in bed when a shadow appeared, opened my closet door, and rushed toward me. I was terrified. Afterward, much of the activity seemed to stop, or my awareness of it changed.

In 1989, at a friend’s East Texas ranch near the Davy Crockett National Forest, I also had an experience I described as a Bigfoot encounter. I include that because my experiences didn’t begin with extraterrestrials and never stayed in one category. Their different forms became important to how I later understood the pattern.

In 1991, I attended Southern Nazarene University and studied religion and psychology. I considered ministry and met Stacy there. After two years, department leaders told me they did not think I was suited for ministry because I questioned doctrine too often. I left disillusioned.

Stacy and I married in March 1993, and for roughly twenty years I worked in IT and focused on supporting my family. I was not a public UFO personality.

THE INJURY AND THE MEMORIES THAT CHANGED MY LIFE

In 2013, I suffered a serious work injury and needed multiple surgeries on my shoulder, bicep, and forearm. I was in pain, unable to work normally, and under financial strain. Stacy, our daughter, our newborn son, and I moved into my parents’ home while I went through surgery and rehabilitation. I also suffered a detached retina and underwent procedures to restore my vision.

During preparation for one eye procedure, while receiving an injection, I experienced what felt like a sudden return of memories. The material became the basis of the accounts I later called 20 and Back, the Secret Space Program, and MILAB, meaning military abduction. I understood them as memories of being identified as a child, taken into covert programs, and used because of unusual sensitivity.

Those recollections were overwhelming. They arrived when I was injured, under stress, and trying to hold my family together. At the time, I connected them with my childhood GATE placement and understood them as memories of covert programs. Years later, questioning those memories became an important part of questioning the entire story I had accepted.

Around the same period, I began dreaming about the beings I later called Blue Avians. By 2014, those experiences felt physical, interactive, and external. I initially discussed them privately with people in the UFO community because I wanted answers.

After I declined a podcast invitation, a UFO personality exposed my identity. That helped set in motion the events that led to my public role.

COSMIC DISCLOSURE AND THE FICTION I BUILT AROUND MY EXPERIENCES

David Wilcock and I began Cosmic Disclosure on Gaia in July 2015. The show took off and put my accounts in front of a worldwide audience. Private experiences that I was still trying to understand became the subject of interviews, spiritual discussions, arguments, and expectations from people who wanted me to explain what was happening to humanity.

At the same time, I developed science-fiction entertainment based on themes from my experiences. I created fictional content based on those experiences for books, comics, games, and possible film and television projects. That creative work involved developing characters, plots, settings, and lore for a franchise. A fictional adaptation is not a documentary record, and it should not be used as proof of an experience.

The distinction became harder to maintain as other people took pieces of my account and developed their own versions. Some treated the material as spiritual revelation. Others used it as entertainment or incorporated it into their own alleged contact stories. My testimony, the fiction, and the surrounding community’s additions became mixed together in public discussion.

Litigation over my story and business interests worsened that confusion. People circulated statements from my deposition as proof that I admitted to inventing everything.

My position has not changed: I honestly described experiences I perceived as real, and I also developed fiction for an entertainment franchise. Creating science fiction around an experience does not mean I deliberately fabricated it.

THE MESSAGES BEGAN TO TROUBLE ME

During those years, the experiences at home also became darker. My family and I reported shadows and oppressive activity. Some people harassing us claimed to practice black magic. The overlap added to the fear and stress we were already living with. I no longer experienced the subject as a harmless exploration of mysteries.

By 2022, I was seeing what I interpreted as Luciferian and polytheistic influences in parts of the disclosure community. I recall an influential person on the streaming platform encouraging me to promote Lucifer in my show. That was a serious turning point for me. I had not entered this work intending to carry that message.

I began speaking against the Galactic Federation narrative in 2022. I was examining its religious content and the material I associated with Joy of Satan Ministries at joyofsatanministries.org. People were accepting teachings presented as guidance from benevolent extraterrestrials without asking about the religious ideas behind them.

That was the connection I wanted people to examine. I could no longer endorse the message simply because it came wrapped in familiar disclosure language.

My concerns also came from behind-the-scenes conversations. People I dealt with described secret-society or occult affiliations and their own expectations for disclosure. I was hearing religious ideas in an industry that presented itself to audiences as a source of information about UFOs.

I began to understand that some people were pursuing spiritual agendas alongside the public discussion. That is what I mean by infiltration: religious teachings and loyalties entering a conversation whose audience may not recognize what it is being asked to accept.

For me, the danger was the influence those ideas could have across the community: contactees repeating messages, industry figures deciding what to produce, claimed military sources supplying authority, and broadcasters bringing it to large audiences.

A person does not have to understand the whole message to help spread it. I know that because I spread teachings I later rejected. My concern is with those teachings and how they are promoted, rather than assigning a hidden allegiance to every person who discusses UFOs.

The teaching that troubled me most was that humanity’s creators or saviors would arrive as advanced beings and explain that our religions had misunderstood them. I began recognizing older religious ideas in extraterrestrial language.

From my Christian perspective, that is a serious spiritual danger. Scientific terminology does not settle the religious claims attached to it.

WHEN THE APPEARANCE CHANGED

One experience brought those doubts into focus. I recall three radiant, angelic-looking beings appearing in my bedroom. They resembled the blond, blue-eyed Nordic figures familiar in Galactic Federation accounts.

They asked, “Why do you persecute us?”

Then their appearance seemed to shift for a moment, and I saw Grey aliens instead. They appeared surprised and left through the ceiling. That encounter broke my trust in appearances.

This shifting of masks made me begin to see the phenomenon as a trickster. My experiences had moved through shadows, apparent spirits, Blue Avians, Nordic imagery, and later biblical and medieval language. I started asking whether the appearance was something I was meant to respond to rather than a dependable indication of identity.

The pattern I saw was that the presentation changed with the beliefs of the person receiving it. In my experience, the appearance was not a dependable guide to the message or its intentions. That is why I stopped giving spiritual authority to something simply because it appeared beautiful, advanced, or familiar.

QUESTIONING MY MEMORIES AND THE REGRESSION

Learning about documented MKULTRA experiments and behavioral manipulation made me reconsider memories I had once accepted without question. I began asking whether suggestion, conditioning, or an identity built around a mission could shape a person’s account.

My eye injury remained an important turning point in my history. The bigger change was that I stopped treating a memory’s force as a guarantee of its accuracy.

In December 2025, I traveled to Calgary to film CONTACTED. They arranged a regression session, and I expected it to focus on my existing 20 and Back or MILAB material.

Instead, it produced a much larger story: traveling through plasma, feeling confined near or within the Sun, a cosmic clock, a body beneath Antarctic snow, and an egg-shaped craft. It also included imagery of reincarnation, a mission, and other beings.

The session left me with more questions. The transcript records my confusion and my repeated attempts to understand the images. I had gone there to examine earlier memories and came away with more material to sort through. It also returned to childhood, alleged electroshock, and the feeling that I was part of a play.

The transcript matters because it preserves the whole exchange: the questions, my answers, my hesitation, and the discussion afterward. The setting included language about a higher self, guides, angelic beings, and contracts.

Reading it today, I see how easily a search for answers can become another expanding spiritual narrative. The session records an experience; it does not authenticate the story that emerged.

In the weeks afterward, I heard what sounded like ceremonial trumpets and the phrase “The Order of Melchizedek.” My family had returned to Christianity, yet the experiences were now using language that seemed closer to that religious framework.

That reinforced my concern that the presentation was adapting as my beliefs changed.

THE PROSPECTIVE INVESTOR AND THE FEBRUARY VISIT

Around my birthday in February 2026, a business figure I had befriended visited after discussing an investment in our video-game and entertainment company.

He identified himself as a 33rd Degree Mason, a high-level Templar, and someone connected to a powerful European group. I had understood the relationship as a possible opportunity to rebuild the business.

He stayed up into the early hours telling us I was part of a 350-year-old Masonic prophecy, that my likeness appeared on an old coin, that I was Jesus reincarnated, and that my family would become the thirteenth family of the Illuminati.

These were his claims. I reject those identity claims and do not present them as truths about myself.

My business partner Mike, his wife, our friend Caressa, Stacy, and our two children were present at the gathering. Each person can speak to what they heard or observed.

I found the conversation deeply unsettling. I was trying to bring my family back to church and build a business, and this visitor was assigning me an identity and a prophecy. His claimed affiliations were part of what he told us. The encounter made me reconsider the relationship and the investment discussions that had brought him into our home.

ZEDEK AND SEVEN WEEKS OF RESISTANCE

During the prophecy discussion, I felt something enter or invade my body or energy field. Two evenings later, at dinner with the visitor and his fiancée, I experienced involuntary speech associated with an identity calling itself Zedek.

It claimed to belong to a divine council of Elohim and spoke of justice, jubilee, and the old gods. I am reporting what I perceived, not endorsing its claimed identity or authority.

For roughly seven weeks afterward, I experienced intense internal and spiritual conflict. I felt pressured to submit and was told I was on the brink of a major breakthrough in communicating with it and “the others.”

I resisted through prayer, fasting, and my Christian faith. I understood the experience as attempted possession.

When I finally felt the contact break, I perceived the message, “Too much has been invested in you to let you go.”

After that, I wanted no part of another breakthrough. I wanted the experiences to stop. Whatever explanation someone ultimately gives for that period, the pressure I felt to surrender was enough for me to refuse further engagement.

WHAT I WAS TOLD ABOUT THE ORACLE PROJECT

Between 2019 and 2020, people I understood to be military contacts approached me about involving my family in a project. They proposed regular interviews and medical examinations, including MRIs.

They also wanted to build relationships with my children by taking them to sporting events without our supervision. Because of the frightening memories I associated with my own childhood, I refused. I never heard back from those contacts.

Later, individuals and families claiming involvement described something they called the Oracle Project or Oracle Program. I heard accounts involving universities, military-intelligence interests, and secret-society members studying contactee families.

In those accounts, some contacting beings were understood as old gods, and human intermediaries were described as oracles. I was described as an “Oracle of Zedek.” I do not accept that as a title or obligation.

The comparison that concerns me is the old practice of rulers seeking direction from oracles. The accounts I heard described human intermediaries consulting purported intelligences for guidance. They also included claims about beings associated with different regions and competing interests.

Those accounts shaped my concern that spiritual authority could be exercised through people with status and influence.

For my family, what mattered was the boundary. I had refused the proposed access to my children, and I would not accept a role as an oracle. Hearing a story that seemed to explain my experiences was no reason to surrender that boundary.

BRAIN STUDIES AND THE SEARCH FOR AN EXPLANATION

Garry Nolan’s discussions of MRI observations involving the caudate nucleus and putamen caught my attention. So did research into genetic differences among people reporting unusual experiences, including exploratory work involving TNRC18 and ARHGEF18.

I understand why experiencers look to those studies for an explanation. After years of being told that nothing happened, a biological explanation can feel like recognition.

But brain research does not tell a person that a message is spiritually trustworthy. Those studies do not establish a psychic gene, a genetic switch that Christianity turns off, or trauma activating contact abilities.

My point is personal and practical: even if someone has unusual sensitivity, that doesn’t mean they should pursue every experience or accept the identity it offers. I choose to seek the Holy Spirit and live within the boundaries of my Christian faith.

DISCLOSURE AND WHO GETS TO TELL THE STORY

The public conversation has changed. I have watched prominent new shows become important outlets for military witnesses, scientists, and disclosure claims. Their access and influence raise questions for me about who selects the guests, who supplies the information, and how audiences learn to trust a particular version of events.

Those changes made me question how disclosure narratives are shaped and how sincere people might repeat a message out of patriotism or a belief that they are helping the public.

Audiences deserve to ask about sourcing, funding, editorial decisions, and conflicts of interest. Subscriber counts and access to guests cannot answer those questions on their own.

The shift from UFO language to UAP language helped move the subject into an official framework. Government agencies now use UAP to refer to unidentified anomalous phenomena. My concern is about who defines the discussion and whose accounts receive attention.

The questions I want asked are concrete: who supplies the information, what can be checked, and how independent is the interviewer?

The story’s religious destination concerns me most. I believe some of the disclosure narratives I encountered risk turning ancient gods into alien creators or saviors and public curiosity into religious allegiance.

That is the danger I now see through my Christian faith. It is why I am speaking about the influences I encountered instead of continuing to promote their teachings.

THE LAW OF ONE AND THE PROMISE OF SPIRITUAL GROWTH

The Law of One is one teaching I now want people to examine closely. A Christian can enter that material believing it is another way of discussing love, service, and unity, then gradually adopt a very different account of God, Jesus, creation, and spiritual authority.

That is why I have described it as a gateway into the esoteric world. I am speaking about the effect I believe these teachings can have, including the effect they had around my own work.

Hermeticism, channeled cosmologies, ascended masters, and extraterrestrial creator narratives aren’t interchangeable, but they can blend in disclosure culture. The language of awakening can make the religious changes seem less significant than they are.

Before long, a person may rely on a contactee or alleged intelligence to reinterpret their entire faith.

I have similar concerns about CE5 and other practices intended to invite contact. A light in the sky, a powerful dream, or a shared experience does not answer the questions that matter most to me now: what am I inviting, what authority am I giving it, and what is this doing to my life?

I no longer encourage people to pursue contact.

THE CLAIMS ABOUT THE BONES OF JESUS

I am also concerned about claims that Templar-connected groups possess the remains of Jesus or his family. Timothy Hogan and Scott Wolter have publicly discussed alleged remains, ossuaries, hidden vaults, and alternative accounts of Christian history.

These claims matter because they could persuade Christians that the resurrection did not happen.

I was told about supposed remains in Turkey and scientific testing. When I examined the public interview material, the accounts were more complicated. Hogan discussed different alleged locations, including Istanbul, and said testing had not occurred.

I do not want those details blurred together. The claim’s religious impact is serious enough that its wording matters.

A presentation involving ancient artifacts, a secret vault, and DNA can look convincing. But a relationship between two samples doesn’t prove either belonged to Jesus.

Before anyone changes their faith because of a laboratory report, they should ask who recovered the material, how it was identified, who has held it, and what the testing actually shows.

My concern is that a claim of possessing Jesus’s bones could become a powerful tool for challenging belief in the resurrection, especially if it is presented alongside disclosure and newly revealed secret knowledge.

I will not treat a dramatic presentation as a reason to abandon Christ.

THE YESHUA SCROLL AND THE JORDAN LEAD CODICES

Scott Wolter’s Yeshua Scroll is another part of this discussion. The narrative presented around it offers an alternative account of Jesus’s life, including the claim that he survived crucifixion.

That differs from Hogan’s discussion of resurrection as awakening to gnosis. These stories challenge Christian belief in different ways and should be examined separately.

The Jordan lead codices, sometimes promoted as an ancient book connected directly to Jesus, are another separate case. The fact that an object contains old material does not establish who wrote its text or when it was written.

I want manuscript specialists and historians examining the provenance, language, dating, and proposed decoding of these objects. An interview is a place to hear a claim; it is not artifact authentication.

I also want people to be careful with claims that skull-and-crossbones imagery means possession of Jesus’s remains or leverage over the Church. This wider discussion presents that interpretation. We need to examine it as a specific historical claim, rather than accept it because the symbolism is striking.

ANCIENT TEXTS AND CLAIMS OF A HIDDEN RELIGIOUS HISTORY

Ancient texts that once required specialist access now circulate through websites, films, podcasts, and social media. That makes it easier to encounter unfamiliar traditions, but also easier to present fragments as a hidden history that supposedly overturns Christianity.

The subjects include the Book of Enoch, Ethiopian manuscripts, Hermetic texts, pre-flood civilizations, alleged hidden libraries in Turkey, Iraq, Iran, Ethiopia, and Egypt, and claims about underwater structures at Lake Van.

I want these subjects researched carefully. Calling a structure pre-flood does not date it, and calling a text suppressed does not establish its authority.

Ethiopian Christianity also deserves accurate representation. Its scriptural tradition differs from many Western churches, including its use of Enoch, but it is not a Christianity that rejects the resurrection.

Questions about who brought manuscripts to Western attention, or whether a collector belonged to a lodge, are separate from what the manuscripts actually say.

The danger I see is a familiar sales pitch: everything you learned was false, a small circle preserved the real teaching, and now someone has been chosen to reveal it.

I understand the appeal of that story. I also understand how it can keep someone looking for the next revelation.

TEMPLARS AND EXPECTATIONS ABOUT 2033

The visitor to my home was not the only reason I became interested in modern Templar claims. I have also followed public discussion involving Bob McGwier and Chris Bledsoe, as well as reports of being approached by a Templar group. The language’s resemblance caught my attention.

I do not attribute the claim that Bledsoe is Jesus reincarnated without an original statement from him. My own account of that claim concerns what the visitor said about me.

I was also told about competing factions in intelligence and esoteric circles. Some accounts used names such as the Old Guard or Collins Elite for people who saw the phenomenon as demonic; others described groups that treated contact with beings as communion with old gods and sought cooperation.

These are accounts I encountered, not one organization I can describe from direct observation.

Public contacts between modern Templar associations and Catholic institutions also belong in the research. Different associations, Masonic groups, and the medieval order should not be collapsed into one body. A meeting or volunteer audience does not, by itself, establish that the Church has accepted an esoteric doctrine.

Some people I understood as secret-society contacts connected their expectations to 2033. The Church’s public anticipation of the two-thousandth anniversary of redemption is a separate fact.

My concern is about people arranging their own agendas around religious expectations and then presenting events as confirmation of prophecy. I do not want to replace one disclosure countdown with another.

THE HARASSMENT AND LOSING DAVID

The public controversy came with years of what I describe as cyberstalking, discrediting efforts, and interference with our ability to work. I experienced the consequences in my family life, reputation, finances, and business. I believe that pressure also weighed heavily on David.

Criticism of extraordinary claims is legitimate; threats, stalking, or harassment are different and should be assessed based on specific records.

David died by suicide on April 20, 2026. His family’s public statement described depression and severe financial pressures. I believe the hostility we experienced deserves serious examination as part of what he endured.

His death is a personal loss to me, and the record of those years matters. It does not establish a single cause for his death.

Before his death, David had told me about frightening experiences he understood as demonic or shadow activity. Because he also spoke of an intelligence he understood as Archangel Michael, I wondered whether it paralleled the changing identities in my own account. Those parallels stayed with me.

I expect more criticism as I discuss my return to Christianity and change the direction of my business. Years of public conflict have left me concerned about further damage to my reputation and livelihood.

I intend to preserve records, answer legitimate questions, and keep explaining why I walked away. I will assess future coverage by what it actually says and does.

TAKING RESPONSIBILITY AND CHANGING MY WORK

People sent me emails saying my information had awakened them. Some said they were leaving Christianity because of it. Once I stopped trusting the teachings, I could not ignore what those messages meant.

I came to believe I had become the kind of false prophet my grandfather warned me about. That is how I understand my former spiritual influence through my Christian faith.

I publicly challenged the information and did what I could to discredit the teachings while protecting my business IP. It damaged my reputation and business interests, but I could not live with continuing to influence people’s spiritual lives in a direction I no longer believed was right.

I cannot undo those years. I can explain why I withdrew my endorsement.

By late 2024, I had demanded that contact stop. My family returned to church in August 2025, and I was baptized in June 2026. We experienced peace we had not felt in a long time. I associated prayer in Jesus’s name with relief from much of the invasive activity.

My priorities now are my family, faith, health, and building a stable life.

That change includes Disclosure Media. I am reworking the franchise from material that carried polytheistic religion and lore into stories told through a Christian perspective and Christian values.

The books, graphic novels, games, and screen projects can still explore science fiction and mystery. I no longer want their spiritual message to promote beliefs I have rejected.

I am also moving away from paranormal series about ghosts, Bigfoot, and aliens. I want to make Ancient Aliens-style shows that examine ancient history, religious texts, extraordinary claims, and disclosures from a monotheistic Christian perspective.

I want to investigate the spiritual claims being sold alongside the mysteries, including the dangers I believe I encountered in occult doctrines and alien-savior teachings.

We are not building traditional religious programming. I want to reach people who may never enter a church or consider Christianity on their own.

Through entertainment, we can raise deeper questions and point people toward the truth, hope, and authority I find in Jesus Christ. That requires being honest about where the fiction ends, what I personally experienced, and what the evidence can actually establish.

FOR PEOPLE DISCOVERING UFOS THROUGH THE HEARINGS

If you came to this subject through recent whistleblowers, congressional hearings, or a popular podcast, I want you to understand the community you are entering.

A serious question about unexplained sightings can quickly lead into a world of spiritual claims, competing personalities, paid access, and people offering answers that go far beyond the evidence presented at a hearing.

Most of the people I met were spiritual, kind, and sincerely looking for answers. Many had experienced something they could not explain and wanted someone to listen. Those people deserve respect. They also deserve protection from anyone who sees their uncertainty, grief, loneliness, or spiritual curiosity as an opportunity.

The dangers I want newcomers to recognize include financial exploitation, sexual pressure, demands for secrecy, and leaders who use a supposed mission or special knowledge to make people dependent on them.

Be wary if someone says you need to pay more to learn who you really are, accept sexual contact as part of healing or spiritual advancement, cut off people who question the group, or surrender control to prove your commitment.

A spiritual title does not excuse coercion.

Some people are also dealing with serious distress or mental-health difficulties. That calls for compassion and appropriate support. It should not be confused with deliberate abuse, and a person’s distress should never become material for someone else’s sales pitch, recruitment, or entertainment.

I also want people to recognize the culture of public humiliation that exists around this subject. Some channels build attention by targeting people, turning conflict into a continuing show, and encouraging audiences to join in.

Asking hard questions and exposing a false claim are legitimate. Doxxing, threats, sexual humiliation, and sustained personal harassment are not research. Popularity does not make that conduct acceptable.

From the material I have collected and the conversations I have had, I have come to suspect overlap between some of the hostility directed at me and the occult influences that concerned me behind the scenes. That is my interpretation of my evidence.

A criticism or hostile video does not, by itself, establish a coordinated operation or reveal someone’s religion or motives. Specific conduct and records matter.

Do not assume a person is trustworthy because they have a large audience, a military background, a scientific credential, or access to a celebrated guest.

Those things may matter to a particular claim, but they don’t give anyone authority over your money, your body, your relationships, or your faith. You can be interested in what happened at a hearing without joining a spiritual movement or accepting the people around it as guides.

I wish I had understood those boundaries earlier. Take your time. Keep relationships outside the community. Read the original documents, compare accounts, and notice whether the people asking for your trust welcome scrutiny.

You don’t owe anyone belief, money, intimacy, or continued participation just because they say you have been chosen.

TO THE ESOTERIC COMMUNITY AND THOSE WHO LEFT CHRISTIANITY

I understand why these subjects attract people. I was looking for answers too. When an experience feels personal and profound, it can seem impossible that the message could be wrong.

I am asking you to consider that possibility before you build your faith, identity, or future around it.

Don’t give a contactee, a podcaster, a secret group, or a claimed intelligence authority over your conscience just because they seem to know something extraordinary. That includes me.

Ask what can be checked. Be cautious when questioning is treated as spiritual failure, when fear keeps you involved, or when you are told surrender is the price of a breakthrough.

If you left Christianity because of information I shared, I am asking you to reconsider that decision. I no longer stand behind the esoteric teachings I once promoted. I cannot say my earlier certainty was justified, and I regret the effect it had on people who trusted me.

Please read the Gospels for yourself and speak with Christians you trust. You do not have to work your way through another hidden teaching to return to Jesus.

You may step back from experiences that frighten or destabilize you. Keep people you trust involved. Prayer and pastoral support can sit alongside qualified medical or mental-health care when sleep, distress, or unwanted experiences are affecting daily life.

You do not have to settle the explanation before seeking help or setting boundaries.

My warning comes from my own experience. I believed I was helping people, and it took me years to question the authority I had given these experiences.

I am no longer seeking contact or a special role in someone else’s prophecy. I am choosing my faith and my family, and I want the work I create from here forward to reflect that.

My concern is that these teachings and narratives can come together into something deeply deceptive—something people accept because it promises answers, spiritual growth, or hope.

I know how convincing that can feel because I once promoted messages I now reject. I am speaking out because I want as many people as possible to pause, examine what they are being asked to believe, and recognize the dangers I encountered.

If my testimony helps someone avoid exploitation or reconsider walking away from Christ, sharing it will have been worth it.

#UFO #UAP #Disclosure #ChristianTestimony #SpiritualDiscernment #NHI #CoreyGoode